<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Selling Government</title>
	<atom:link href="http://manfredeye.com/selling-government/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://manfredeye.com/selling-government/</link>
	<description>For middle and working class Americans</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 14:12:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Manfred</title>
		<link>http://manfredeye.com/selling-government/comment-page-1/#comment-918</link>
		<dc:creator>Manfred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 00:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manfredeye.com/?p=167#comment-918</guid>
		<description>Excellent government service is not compatible with the maximization of profit. This type of thing also lacks oversight and accountability.
I am not adverse to government contracting per se, but the process should be open and competitive. I also have a problem with independent contractors performing such tasks as high-level intelligence gathering, military duties, and sensitive financial matters.
Should those whose ultimate loyalty is to profit really have top-secret security clearances?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent government service is not compatible with the maximization of profit. This type of thing also lacks oversight and accountability.<br />
I am not adverse to government contracting per se, but the process should be open and competitive. I also have a problem with independent contractors performing such tasks as high-level intelligence gathering, military duties, and sensitive financial matters.<br />
Should those whose ultimate loyalty is to profit really have top-secret security clearances?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fritz</title>
		<link>http://manfredeye.com/selling-government/comment-page-1/#comment-913</link>
		<dc:creator>Fritz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 22:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://manfredeye.com/?p=167#comment-913</guid>
		<description>Ever heard of the concept of &quot;thickening government&quot;?  Check out the book by Paul Charles Light called Thickening Government: Federal Hierarchy and the Diffusion of Accountability.  While I wouldn&#039;t want to downplay your concerns, going too far in the other direction isn&#039;t exactly a panacea, either.  Bureaucracies can be remarkably resistant to political, popular, legislative, and executive pressure as well.  While the profit motive may be crass, at least it gives us a chance to predict and understand the behavior of a corporation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever heard of the concept of &#8220;thickening government&#8221;?  Check out the book by Paul Charles Light called Thickening Government: Federal Hierarchy and the Diffusion of Accountability.  While I wouldn&#8217;t want to downplay your concerns, going too far in the other direction isn&#8217;t exactly a panacea, either.  Bureaucracies can be remarkably resistant to political, popular, legislative, and executive pressure as well.  While the profit motive may be crass, at least it gives us a chance to predict and understand the behavior of a corporation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
